South Korean President Yoon Suk-yeol Denies Rebellion Charges, Claims Martial Law Was the Right Decision

South Korean President Yoon Suk-yeol has stated that deploying troops to parliament under martial law cannot be equated to a rebellion. Yoon asserts that he exercised his presidential powers to declare martial law "to protect the nation and normalize government affairs" against an opposition that had paralyzed governmental operations. He described it as a "well-calculated political decision" and dismissed calls for his resignation.

However, despite previously opposing such measures, the leader of the ruling party now calls for a vote to impeach the president. Additionally, the South Korean parliament passed a bill supporting a special investigation into First Lady Kim Keon-hee over allegations of securities fraud.

Why Martial Law Could Be a Mistake

1. Violation of Constitutional Principles:

Declaring martial law without an apparent external threat can be seen as undermining democratic processes and violating the constitution, which stipulates such measures only in emergencies.

2. Political Instability:

The imposition of martial law has sparked widespread protests and political instability, potentially deterring investors and undermining the country's economic development. It could also damage South Korea's international image as a stable democracy.

3. Relations with Allies:

Such actions might strain relations with key allies like the United States, which have expressed concern over the developments in South Korea. This could impact defense and economic agreements.

4. Internal Conflict:

Martial law has led to a conflict between branches of government, evident in the parliament's and even members of Yoon's own party's reactions. This could lead to a prolonged governance crisis, undermining governmental efficiency.

5. Legal Consequences:

The impeachment initiated by the ruling party leader and the special investigation into the First Lady point to potential legal repercussions that could affect not only Yoon but his close associates as well.

In light of these arguments, many criticize the president's decision as unwarranted and potentially hazardous to democracy and stability in South Korea.